Supreme Court declines to entertain plea challenging curbs on journalists’, activists’ entry into U.P., Rajasthan schools - The Hindu

**Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Entry Restrictions on Journalists and Activists in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan Schools**

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain a petition that sought to overturn state‑government orders restricting the entry of journalists and activists into schools in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan. The petition, filed by a coalition of media bodies and civil‑society groups, argued that the curbs violated the constitutional right to freedom of speech and the press, and impeded public scrutiny of school administration. The court, however, dismissed the plea on procedural grounds, stating that the petitioners had not exhausted the remedies available under the respective state laws before approaching the apex court.

Both Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan have, over the past two years, introduced guidelines that require prior permission from school authorities or the district education officer before any external individual can enter a school premises. The measures were framed as a response to concerns over disruptions, privacy breaches, and the safety of children, especially after a series of protests and media visits that school officials claimed caused “unnecessary disturbance” to the learning environment. The petitioners contended that the rules were overly broad and lacked clear criteria, effectively giving officials unchecked discretion to deny entry.

Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case leaves the existing state regulations intact, at least for the time being. “While the court’s decision does not comment on the merits of the restrictions, it underscores the importance of following the procedural ladder within the judicial system,” said senior advocate Arvind Kumar. The government of Uttar Pradesh and the Rajasthan education department welcomed the ruling, asserting that the guidelines are essential to protect students and maintain order in schools. Meanwhile, press freedom watchdogs have warned that the decision may embolden other states to impose similar limitations without robust judicial oversight.