Can’t have sabka vishwas with tear gas and lathi - The Indian Express

### **Clash between CJP Protestors and Authorities Exposes India's Governance Dilemma**

A contentious protest by the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJP) has sparked a heated debate on the state of India's governance and the approach of the governing party. The protest, which was met with resistance from authorities, saw the use of tear gas and police batons to disperse demonstrators, raising questions about the sincerity of the government's commitment to democratic values. In recent years, India has seen growing concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the increasing reliance on coercive measures to maintain public order.

Critics argue that such incidents undermine the government's narrative of promoting sabka vishwas (trusting everyone), as the use of force against peaceful protesters creates a perception of oppression. The protest, which aimed to highlight concerns about electoral reforms and accountability, has become a focal point for discussions on India's democratic trajectory. Experts and civil society representatives have criticized the authorities' handling of the situation, suggesting that dialogue and inclusive decision-making should replace repressive measures.

The government's assertion that democracy has been effectively established in India and therefore no further protests are necessary has sparked controversy, with many arguing that genuine democratic practices require constructive engagement and listening to diverse perspectives. While some have emphasized the importance of stability and order, others have underlined the need for inclusive and participatory governance. As India grapples with the complex relationships between democracy, power, and governance, the CJP protest has brought these nuances to the forefront.