BREAKING| Withdrawing September 5 Protest : CJP Leader Saurav Das Tells Supreme Court As Centre Acts To... - Live Law

**CJP Leader Saurav Das Withdraws September 5 India Gate Protest After Centre’s Assurances**

New Delhi – The All‑India Chetna Jagruti Party (CJP) announced on Tuesday that it will cancel the mass march scheduled for September 5 at India Gate, citing “concrete assurances” from the Union government. In a brief filing before the Supreme Court, CJP president Saurav Das said the Centre had agreed to withdraw all pending First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against students and supporters who had taken part in the NEET‑related demonstrations earlier this year. “We appreciate the government's willingness to address our concerns and have therefore decided to call off the protest,” Das stated, adding that the party will continue to pursue its demands through “peaceful and democratic channels.”

The protest, initially planned as a nationwide rally to demand the revocation of the NEET‑2024 examination and related policy changes, had drawn significant attention from both the media and the judiciary. Earlier in the week, the Supreme Court had rejected a petition seeking an interim order to halt the march, urging all parties to act responsibly. The court’s refusal underscored the delicate balance between the right to peaceful assembly and the state's interest in maintaining public order. With the FIRs now slated for dismissal, the CJP claims the immediate legal hurdle that prompted the march has been removed.

Reactions to the withdrawal have been mixed. While many student groups welcomed the de‑escalation, some activists warned that the Centre’s concessions may be limited to the specific legal cases and not extend to the broader policy demands. The Ministry of Home Affairs, through a spokesperson, confirmed that the decision to drop the FIRs was taken after “constructive dialogue” with the protest leaders, emphasizing that the government remains open to further discussions on education reforms. Observers note that the episode highlights the growing influence of student‑led movements in shaping national policy debates.